Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Differences Reading Novels vs. Short Stories

    
I feel like novels are much more low pressure to read than short stories, because in short stories you have to immediately, from the get go, start looking for themes, symbols, motifs, etc., because there isn’t time to waste in short stories. I always feel somewhat pressured reading short stories to latch on to what the author is going for very quickly, whereas in a novel I have time to sink in and settle into the story, as the author has ample time to establish characters, write beautifully just for the sake of writing, describe, and delve into various ideas that may not be essential to the plot, but are lovely to read and important to the overall style of the book. In this way, my strategy for reading novels involves more immersion, and trying to connect myself to the story, rather than picking it apart in a literary manner. This novel in particular, like many of Adichie’s short stories, involves an element of learning about an unfamiliar culture. My ignorance really started showing when I went into the book thinking that because I was an expert on the Poisonwood Bible that I would have some sort of prior knowledge, despite the two books taking place in completely different African cultures, between which there is little to no overlap. Therefore throughout this novel I am simply trying to absorb as much as I can, and try to work through it that way instead of picking it apart AP lit style. That will surely come later, but it’s much harder to do with a large work than short stories, where it is possible to analyze the literary choices in one sitting.

No comments:

Post a Comment